“personally is pro-life, but can't bring himself to force that position on others.”
In other words, he wouldn’t personally kill anyone, but won’t prevent others from doing so.
Until you’ve witnessed an abortion you aren’t qualified to say it’s a personal choice. If you have witnessed one & you’re ok with it then that’s on you.
Those who know about heinous crimes and say nothing are complicit.
“personally is pro-life, but can't bring himself to force that position on others.”
In other words, he wouldn’t personally kill anyone, but won’t prevent others from doing so.
Until you’ve witnessed an abortion you aren’t qualified to say it’s a personal choice. If you have witnessed one & you’re ok with it then that’s on you.
Those who know about heinous crimes and say nothing are complicit.
“personally is pro-life, but can't bring himself to force that position on others.”
In other words, he wouldn’t personally kill anyone, but won’t prevent others from doing so.
Until you’ve witnessed an abortion you aren’t qualified to say it’s a personal choice. If you have witnessed one & you’re ok with it then that’s on you.
Those who know about heinous crimes and say nothing are complicit.
You missed the point. Kennedy will do more good for reducing abortion than any President since Roe v. Wade. And he won't be using force.
Do you want results or do you want to keep fighting for your all or nothing position that breeds more contention and hate?